Course Review Learning Guide: Planning Course Review

Overview

Course review focuses on the evaluation of course materials and creates an opportunity to support faculty members through peer commentary on the courses. This section outlines elements to consider when planning for course review.

Course review roles

As outlined in the Faculty Collective Agreement, there are two main roles in the course review process:

=

Pedagogy Committee

No more than three faculty members assigned by the department chair/director to conduct the course review

=

Faculty member

The person whose course is being reviewed (and who will be refered to in this guide).

Course materials

When selecting course materials to review, keep in mind the following elements:

  • Learning outcomes
  • Assessments and grading criteria
  • Instructional methods (e.g., lesson plans, lecture slides)
  • Learning activities (e.g., handouts, worksheets)
  • Course content (e.g., course syllabus, resources, textbook, lab manual)
  • Technology (e.g., learning management system (LMS))

Tip

While it may not be possible to review all materials from a course, consider reviewing materials across the elements listed above to facilitate a holistic review. When selecting materials for review, think about your disciplinary context and expectations around course materials.

Planning considerations

At the beginning of each academic year, the Pedagogy Committee will select the courses to be reviewed for the year in accordance with Section 25 of the Collective Agreement for UVic Faculty and Librarians (2022-2025) 

Each faculty member with assigned graduate or undergraduate teaching shall undergo course reviews. The schedule is found in the Collective Agreement (CA 25.10a-c).

    When planning for a course review within your department, it is helpful to consider the various elements of the review process. These elements include communicating the purpose of the Pedagogy Committee, the role of professional development, and the review process to faculty members. It is also important to consider how the confidentiality of collected information will be maintained and other administrative components. If any issues arise, consult with your Department Chair/Director.

    The Pedagogy Committee will conduct a course review, which is intended to “enable regular review of course materials to ensure program requirements are met, course materials are current, best pedagogy is engaged and support is given in enabling instructor attention to universal design methods, equity principles, decolonization and/or Indigenization, and optimal assessment methodologies” (CA 25.15). We invite you to reflect on the course’s effectiveness, both past and present, and consider how teaching and learning practices might evolve in the future. As you do so, please consider the discipline, available resources, and the overall learning experience within the course and program.  

    Feedback and response

    When preparing feedback, focus on supporting the faculty member’s development and growth by offering feedback that is descriptive and constructive, manageable, and specific (Tse, 2022). Faculty members are asked to respond to the feedback they are given through a brief written response to the Department Chair/Director highlighting what was learned from the course review and address areas for improvement (CA 25.15). As stated within the Collective Agreement, course review feedback and the faculty member’s response shall be included in the faculty member’s teaching dossier.

    University expectations and standards

    To better understand the university’s expectations and standards, please review the following resources:

    If you have specific questions about how Pedagogy Committees work within your area, reach out to your Department Chair or Director.

    Reference

    Tse, C. (2022). “Peer Feedback on Your Teaching.” Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence at the University of Illinois Chicago. Retrieved 06/18/2024 from https://teaching.uic.edu/cate-teaching-guides/reflective-teaching-guides/peer-feedback-on-your-teaching/ 

    Explore the sections

    Planning course review

    Learn what course review is, the main roles and stages in the process, schedule and planning considerations

    Considerations to guide feedback

    Uncover the post review process from the submission of feedback to drafting the instructor response

    Course review template

    Use the template and guidelines for course review report in your pedagogy committee process

    Share your feedback!

    We are actively committed to increasing the accessibility, usability, diversity, and inclusivity of our materials. If you experience any barriers to learning in this course, please contact us to let us. We also welcome any suggestions for future topics you would like us to cover.

    About this post

    Tags:

    This page was last updated:

    June 27, 2024

    We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Xʷsepsəm/Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.

    jQuery(function ($) { //open toggle on button click $('a.open-toggle').on('click', function(event){ $('#toggle3.et_pb_toggle_2 .et_pb_toggle_title').click(); }); }); Skip to content