Course Design/Redesign Grant Rubric

Question

Inadequate

(1.0 – 2.0)

Good

(2.1 – 4.0)

1. Project impact

• Project will impact only a small number of students

• Project will impact a small number of students on an ongoing basis or will impact a large number of students for a brief period

2. Learning outcomes

• Learning outcomes are unclear, unstated, or unfeasible

• Learning outcomes are good, though could be made more feasible or clearer

3. Project context, goals, activities, and timeline

• Project context sparse or not described
• Goals are poorly stated or unfeasible
• Activities do not align with the project goals
• Timeline is not reasonable

• Project context described well but missing some details
• Goals need some work
• Activities somewhat align with the project goals
• Project timeline could use improvement

4. Accessible learning principles

• Project does not include any reference to accessible learning principles (e.g. accessible pedagogy or Universal Design for Learning)

• Project addresses some accessible learning principles (e.g. accessible pedagogy or Universal Design for Learning) but requires further development

5. Equity, diversity, inclusion, and belonging (UVic Equity Action Plan)

• Project does not integrate principles of equity, diversity, inclusion, and belonging

• Project mentions principles of equity, diversity, inclusion, and belonging but their integration could be more developed

7. Literature review

• Literature cited is sparse

• Literature cited is adequate but could use more detail

8. Budget 

• Budget either missing, unclear or poorly elaborated
• Budget poorly aligned with project goals

• Budget moderately elaborated but could use more clarity
• Budget adequately aligned to project goals