Question
Inadequate
(1.0 – 2.0)
Good
(2.1 – 4.0)
Excellent
(4.1 – 5.0)
1. Project impact
- Project will impact only a small number of students
- Project will impact a small number of students on an ongoing basis or will impact a large number of students for a brief period
- Project will impact many students for an extended period
2. Learning outcomes
- Learning outcomes are unclear, unstated, or unfeasible
- Learning outcomes are good, though could be made more feasible or clearer
- Learning outcomes are clear and feasible
3. Project context, goals, activities, and timeline
- Project context sparse or not described
- Goals are poorly stated or unfeasible
- Activities do not align with the project goals
- Timeline is not reasonable
- Project context described well but missing some details
- Goals need some work
- Activities somewhat align with the project goals
- Project timeline could use improvement
- Project context described thoroughly
- Goals are clearly stated
- Goals and activities are well aligned
- Project timeline is reasonable to achieve the stated goals
4. Accessible learning principles
- Project does not include any reference to accessible learning principles (e.g. accessible pedagogy or Universal Design for Learning)
- Project addresses some accessible learning principles (e.g. accessible pedagogy or Universal Design for Learning) but requires further development
- Project centralizes accessible learning principles (e.g. accessible pedagogy or Universal Design for Learning), that are thoroughly articulated
5. Literature review
- Literature cited is sparse
- Literature cited is adequate but could use more detail
- Literature cited well detailed and thorough
6. Budget
- Budget either missing, unclear or poorly elaborated
- Budget poorly aligned with project goals
-
- Budget moderately elaborated but could use more clarity
- Budget adequately aligned to project goals
-
- Budget clear; very well elaborated and linked to projects’ overall goals and/or learning objectives
