SI-I Grant Criteria Chart

Question

Inadequate

(1.0 – 2.0)

Good

(2.1 – 4.0)

1. Project context & goals/ learning outcomes

• Project context sparse or not described
• Goals & learning outcomes missing, poorly stated or unfeasible
• Context and goals either not stated or poorly aligned with UVic’s Indigenous Plan (2017-2022)

• Project context described well but missing some details
• Goals & learning outcomes feasible but need some work
• Elements of UVic’s Indigenous Plan (2017-2022) mentioned but could benefit from better alignment to project

2. Enhancement of student learning

• Possible achieved learning outcomes are not mentioned or vague

• Possible achieved learning outcomes are stated but would benefit from more detail to better align with project and context

3. Decolonization/ Indigenization goals and pathways

• Goals of Indigenization/ Decolonization are not stated or unclear
• How the project leads to the goals is unstated or unclear

• Goals are stated and clear but the pathway to those goals is unclear

4. Literature survey & self preparation

• Literature cited is sparse
• Little to no self-preparation for project

• Literature cited and self-preparation adequate but could use more detail

5. Sharing findings

• Ideas for sharing findings are absent, sparse or unclear

• Ideas for sharing findings are adequate but could be better developed/explained

6. Budget description

• Budget either missing, unclear or poorly elaborated

• Budget poorly aligned with project goals

• Budget moderately elaborated but could use more clarity

• Budget adequately aligned to project goals